diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'debian/patches-rt/0090-block-mq-do-not-invoke-preempt_disable.patch')
| -rw-r--r-- | debian/patches-rt/0090-block-mq-do-not-invoke-preempt_disable.patch | 41 |
1 files changed, 41 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/debian/patches-rt/0090-block-mq-do-not-invoke-preempt_disable.patch b/debian/patches-rt/0090-block-mq-do-not-invoke-preempt_disable.patch new file mode 100644 index 000000000..6b595e9d7 --- /dev/null +++ b/debian/patches-rt/0090-block-mq-do-not-invoke-preempt_disable.patch @@ -0,0 +1,41 @@ +From 69bf76d72d4ea6bbbc291e2bc5bd277473e03ea5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> +Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 14:26:34 +0200 +Subject: [PATCH 090/158] block/mq: do not invoke preempt_disable() +Origin: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/5.15/older/patches-5.15.10-rt24.tar.xz + +preempt_disable() and get_cpu() don't play well together with the sleeping +locks it tries to allocate later. +It seems to be enough to replace it with get_cpu_light() and migrate_disable(). + +Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> +Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> +--- + block/blk-mq.c | 6 +++--- + 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) + +diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c +index 82de39926a9f..330b6274bf6b 100644 +--- a/block/blk-mq.c ++++ b/block/blk-mq.c +@@ -1563,14 +1563,14 @@ static void __blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, bool async, + return; + + if (!async && !(hctx->flags & BLK_MQ_F_BLOCKING)) { +- int cpu = get_cpu(); ++ int cpu = get_cpu_light(); + if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, hctx->cpumask)) { + __blk_mq_run_hw_queue(hctx); +- put_cpu(); ++ put_cpu_light(); + return; + } + +- put_cpu(); ++ put_cpu_light(); + } + + kblockd_mod_delayed_work_on(blk_mq_hctx_next_cpu(hctx), &hctx->run_work, +-- +2.33.1 + |