diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'debian/patches-rt/i2c-exynos5-Remove-IRQF_ONESHOT.patch')
| -rw-r--r-- | debian/patches-rt/i2c-exynos5-Remove-IRQF_ONESHOT.patch | 39 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 39 deletions
diff --git a/debian/patches-rt/i2c-exynos5-Remove-IRQF_ONESHOT.patch b/debian/patches-rt/i2c-exynos5-Remove-IRQF_ONESHOT.patch deleted file mode 100644 index a52748065..000000000 --- a/debian/patches-rt/i2c-exynos5-Remove-IRQF_ONESHOT.patch +++ /dev/null @@ -1,39 +0,0 @@ -From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> -Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2019 12:30:12 +0200 -Subject: [PATCH] i2c: exynos5: Remove IRQF_ONESHOT -Origin: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/5.2/older/patches-5.2.17-rt9.tar.xz - -The drivers sets IRQF_ONESHOT and passes only a primary handler. The IRQ -is masked while the primary is handler is invoked independently of -IRQF_ONESHOT. -With IRQF_ONESHOT the core code will not force-thread the interrupt and -this is probably not intended. I *assume* that the original author copied -the IRQ registration from another driver which passed a primary and -secondary handler and removed the secondary handler but keeping the -ONESHOT flag. - -Remove IRQF_ONESHOT. - -Reported-by: Benjamin Rouxel <benjamin.rouxel@uva.nl> -Tested-by: Benjamin Rouxel <benjamin.rouxel@uva.nl> -Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org> -Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> -Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org -Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> ---- - drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-exynos5.c | 4 +--- - 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) - ---- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-exynos5.c -+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-exynos5.c -@@ -791,9 +791,7 @@ static int exynos5_i2c_probe(struct plat - } - - ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, i2c->irq, exynos5_i2c_irq, -- IRQF_NO_SUSPEND | IRQF_ONESHOT, -- dev_name(&pdev->dev), i2c); -- -+ IRQF_NO_SUSPEND, dev_name(&pdev->dev), i2c); - if (ret != 0) { - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "cannot request HS-I2C IRQ %d\n", i2c->irq); - goto err_clk; |