blob: bc9662127bdb5bfdf0373944377a7004e14eb185 (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
|
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 12:12:14 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 16/19] sched/proc: Print accurate cpumask vs migrate_disable()
Origin: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/5.10/older/patches-5.10.17-rt32.tar.xz
Ensure /proc/*/status doesn't print 'random' cpumasks due to
migrate_disable().
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
---
fs/proc/array.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/proc/array.c
+++ b/fs/proc/array.c
@@ -382,9 +382,9 @@ static inline void task_context_switch_c
static void task_cpus_allowed(struct seq_file *m, struct task_struct *task)
{
seq_printf(m, "Cpus_allowed:\t%*pb\n",
- cpumask_pr_args(task->cpus_ptr));
+ cpumask_pr_args(&task->cpus_mask));
seq_printf(m, "Cpus_allowed_list:\t%*pbl\n",
- cpumask_pr_args(task->cpus_ptr));
+ cpumask_pr_args(&task->cpus_mask));
}
static inline void task_core_dumping(struct seq_file *m, struct mm_struct *mm)
|
