| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
| |
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This was done by the following
find . -name '*.[ch]' | /tmp/pl
where /tmp/pl is the following three-line script:
print unless $. == 1 && m@/\* .*\.[ch] \*/@;
close ARGV if eof; # Close file to reset $.
And then some hand-editing of other files.
Reviewed-by: Viktor Dukhovni <viktor@openssl.org>
|
|
|
|
| |
Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This commit removes NCR, Tandem, Cray.
Regenerates TABLE.
Removes another missing BEOS fluff.
The last platform remaining on this ticket is WIN16.
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
libdes (which is still used out there) or other des implementations,
the OpenSSL DES functions are renamed to begin with DES_ instead of
des_. Compatibility routines are provided and declared by including
openssl/des_old.h. Those declarations are the same as were in des.h
when the OpenSSL project started, which is exactly how libdes looked
at that time, and hopefully still looks today.
The compatibility functions will be removed in some future release, at
the latest in version 1.0.
|
|
|
|
| |
ints, just as in destest.c
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
See http://www.pdc.kth.se/kth-krb/
Their solution for CRAY is somewhat awkward.
I'll assume that a "short" is 32 bits on CRAY to avoid the
#ifdef _CRAY
typedef struct {
unsigned int a:32;
unsigned int b:32;
} XXX;
#else
typedef DES_LONG XXX;
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
(meaning pointer to char) to des_cblock * (meaning pointer to
array with 8 char elements), which allows the compiler to
do more typechecking. (The changed argument types were of type
des_cblock * back in SSLeay, and a lot of ugly casts were
used then to turn them into pointers to elements; but it can be
done without those casts.)
Introduce new type const_des_cblock -- before, the pointers rather
than the elements pointed to were declared const, and for
some reason gcc did not complain about this (but some other
compilers did).
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|