| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Since one generates files that the other depends on, there's no
real reason to keep them separate. Since they were both different
aspects of 'openssl req', the merge ends up in 25-test_req.t.
This also makes cleanup easier.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
|
| |
|
|
| |
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
To be able to run tests when we've built in a directory other than
the source tree, the testing framework needs a few adjustments.
test/testlib/OpenSSL/Test.pm needs to know where it can find
shlib_wrap.sh, and a number of other tests need to be told a different
place to find engines than what they may be able to figure out on
their own. Relying to $TOP is not enough, $SRCTOP and $BLDTOP can be
used as an alternative.
As part of this change, top_file and top_dir are removed and
srctop_file, bldtop_file, srctop_dir and bldtop_dir take their place.
Reviewed-by: Ben Laurie <ben@openssl.org>
|
| |
|
|
| |
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It became tedious as well as error prone to have all recipes use
Test::More as well as OpenSSL::Test. The easier way is to make
OpenSSL::Test an extension of Test::More, thereby having all version
checks as well as future checks firmly there. Additionally, that
allows us to extend existing Test::More functions if the need would
arise.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
|
| |
|
|
| |
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
|
|
|
Some of them make use of recipes/tconversion.pl.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
|
