diff options
author | mame <mame@b2dd03c8-39d4-4d8f-98ff-823fe69b080e> | 2017-09-07 15:40:29 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | mame <mame@b2dd03c8-39d4-4d8f-98ff-823fe69b080e> | 2017-09-07 15:40:29 +0000 |
commit | ccaf52e244f7da1fc0061ecbc8025b46dcdfd53d (patch) | |
tree | f8d575910c93a43ed7bb8d2081a595064e080b55 /test/net | |
parent | 1a643bac88c7f40a5dd8093fcb35d08236b327c5 (diff) | |
download | ruby-ccaf52e244f7da1fc0061ecbc8025b46dcdfd53d.tar.gz |
Measure the test coverage without SimpleCov
Now `make test-all COVERAGE=true` measures the test coverage by using
`coverage.so` directly, and visualize the result by simplecov-html.
There has been some problems in coverage measurement with SimpleCov.
(They are not SimpleCov's fault, though.)
(1) It is difficult to extract the measured data as a machine-readable
format, such as Marshal. I want to visualize the coverage data with
other coverage tools, such as LCOV and Cobertura.
(I know we can use SimpleCov's formatter mechanism, but I don't want
to depend upon SimpleCov so much.)
(2) SimpleCov seems to miss some coverage data. For example,
`lib/cgi.rb` and `lib/ostruct.rb` are dropped. I don't know why.
(3) I have a plan to enhance `coverage.so` with branch coverage.
It would be difficult to continue to only use SimpleCov as is.
This is the most important reason.
git-svn-id: svn+ssh://ci.ruby-lang.org/ruby/trunk@59770 b2dd03c8-39d4-4d8f-98ff-823fe69b080e
Diffstat (limited to 'test/net')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions