From 16267c7fee9441c19c7bf13a012fe847a1308d14 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: hsbt Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2016 06:01:14 +0000 Subject: * lib/rubygems.rb, lib/rubygems/*, test/rubygems/*: Update rubygems-2.6.3. Please see entries of 2.6.3 on https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/blob/master/History.txt git-svn-id: svn+ssh://ci.ruby-lang.org/ruby/trunk@54500 b2dd03c8-39d4-4d8f-98ff-823fe69b080e --- test/rubygems/test_gem_specification.rb | 15 +++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'test/rubygems/test_gem_specification.rb') diff --git a/test/rubygems/test_gem_specification.rb b/test/rubygems/test_gem_specification.rb index bc1c8d2ca7..8598e924ff 100644 --- a/test/rubygems/test_gem_specification.rb +++ b/test/rubygems/test_gem_specification.rb @@ -100,6 +100,17 @@ end load 'rubygems/syck_hack.rb' end + def test_self_find_active_stub_by_path + spec = new_spec('a', '1', nil, 'lib/foo.rb') + spec.activated = true + + # There used to be a bug (introduced in a9c1aaf) when Gem::Specification + # objects are present in the @stubs collection. This test verifies that + # this scenario works correctly. + Gem::Specification.all = [spec] + Gem::Specification.find_active_stub_by_path('foo') + end + def test_self_activate foo = util_spec 'foo', '1' @@ -3373,7 +3384,7 @@ end assert Gem::Specification.find_by_name "a", "1" assert Gem::Specification.find_by_name "a", ">1" - assert_raises Gem::LoadError do + assert_raises Gem::MissingSpecError do Gem::Specification.find_by_name "monkeys" end end @@ -3387,7 +3398,7 @@ end assert Gem::Specification.find_by_name "b" - assert_raises Gem::LoadError do + assert_raises Gem::MissingSpecVersionError do Gem::Specification.find_by_name "b", "1" end -- cgit v1.2.3