1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
|
require_relative '../../spec_helper'
require_relative 'fixtures/classes'
EvalSpecs::A.new.c
describe "Kernel#eval" do
it "is a private method" do
Kernel.should have_private_instance_method(:eval)
end
it "is a module function" do
Kernel.respond_to?(:eval).should == true
end
it "evaluates the code within" do
eval("2 + 3").should == 5
end
it "coerces an object to string" do
eval(EvalSpecs::CoercedObject.new).should == 5
end
it "evaluates within the scope of the eval" do
EvalSpecs::A::B.name.should == "EvalSpecs::A::B"
end
it "evaluates such that consts are scoped to the class of the eval" do
EvalSpecs::A::C.name.should == "EvalSpecs::A::C"
end
it "finds a local in an enclosing scope" do
a = 1
eval("a").should == 1
end
it "updates a local in an enclosing scope" do
a = 1
eval("a = 2")
a.should == 2
end
it "updates a local in a surrounding block scope" do
EvalSpecs.new.f do
a = 1
eval("a = 2")
a.should == 2
end
end
it "updates a local in a scope above a surrounding block scope" do
a = 1
EvalSpecs.new.f do
eval("a = 2")
a.should == 2
end
a.should == 2
end
it "updates a local in a scope above when modified in a nested block scope" do
a = 1
es = EvalSpecs.new
eval("es.f { es.f { a = 2 } }")
a.should == 2
end
it "finds locals in a nested eval" do
eval('test = 10; eval("test")').should == 10
end
it "does not share locals across eval scopes" do
code = fixture __FILE__, "eval_locals.rb"
ruby_exe(code).chomp.should == "NameError"
end
it "doesn't accept a Proc object as a binding" do
x = 1
bind = proc {}
lambda { eval("x", bind) }.should raise_error(TypeError)
end
it "does not make Proc locals visible to evaluated code" do
bind = proc { inner = 4 }
lambda { eval("inner", bind.binding) }.should raise_error(NameError)
end
# REWRITE ME: This obscures the real behavior of where locals are stored
# in eval bindings.
it "allows a binding to be captured inside an eval" do
outer_binding = binding
level1 = eval("binding", outer_binding)
level2 = eval("binding", level1)
eval("x = 2", outer_binding)
eval("y = 3", level1)
eval("w=1", outer_binding)
eval("w", outer_binding).should == 1
eval("w=1", level1).should == 1
eval("w", level1).should == 1
eval("w=1", level2).should == 1
eval("w", level2).should == 1
eval("x", outer_binding).should == 2
eval("x=2", level1)
eval("x", level1).should == 2
eval("x=2", level2)
eval("x", level2).should == 2
eval("y=3", outer_binding)
eval("y", outer_binding).should == 3
eval("y=3", level1)
eval("y", level1).should == 3
eval("y=3", level2)
eval("y", level2).should == 3
end
it "uses the same scope for local variables when given the same binding" do
outer_binding = binding
eval("if false; a = 1; end", outer_binding)
eval("a", outer_binding).should be_nil
end
it "allows creating a new class in a binding" do
bind = proc {}
eval("class EvalBindingProcA; end; EvalBindingProcA.name", bind.binding).should =~ /EvalBindingProcA$/
end
it "allows creating a new class in a binding created by #eval" do
bind = eval "binding"
eval("class EvalBindingA; end; EvalBindingA.name", bind).should =~ /EvalBindingA$/
end
it "includes file and line information in syntax error" do
expected = 'speccing.rb'
lambda {
eval('if true',TOPLEVEL_BINDING, expected)
}.should raise_error(SyntaxError) { |e|
e.message.should =~ /#{expected}:1:.+/
}
end
it "evaluates string with given filename and negative linenumber" do
expected_file = 'speccing.rb'
lambda {
eval('if true',TOPLEVEL_BINDING, expected_file, -100)
}.should raise_error(SyntaxError) { |e|
e.message.should =~ /#{expected_file}:-100:.+/
}
end
it "sets constants at the toplevel from inside a block" do
# The class Object bit is needed to workaround some mspec oddness
class Object
[1].each { eval "Const = 1"}
Const.should == 1
remove_const :Const
end
end
it "uses the filename of the binding if none is provided" do
eval("__FILE__").should == "(eval)"
eval("__FILE__", binding).should == __FILE__
eval("__FILE__", binding, "success").should == "success"
eval("eval '__FILE__', binding").should == "(eval)"
eval("eval '__FILE__', binding", binding).should == __FILE__
eval("eval '__FILE__', binding", binding, 'success').should == 'success'
end
# Found via Rubinius bug github:#149
it "does not alter the value of __FILE__ in the binding" do
first_time = EvalSpecs.call_eval
second_time = EvalSpecs.call_eval
# This bug is seen by calling the method twice and comparing the values
# of __FILE__ each time. If the bug is present, calling eval will set the
# value of __FILE__ to the eval's "filename" argument.
second_time.should_not == "(eval)"
first_time.should == second_time
end
it "can be aliased" do
alias aliased_eval eval
x = 2
aliased_eval('x += 40')
x.should == 42
end
# See http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JRUBY-5163
it "uses the receiver as self inside the eval" do
eval("self").should equal(self)
Kernel.eval("self").should equal(Kernel)
end
it "does not pass the block to the method being eval'ed" do
lambda {
eval('KernelSpecs::EvalTest.call_yield') { "content" }
}.should raise_error(LocalJumpError)
end
it "returns from the scope calling #eval when evaluating 'return'" do
lambda { eval("return :eval") }.call.should == :eval
end
it "unwinds through a Proc-style closure and returns from a lambda-style closure in the closure chain" do
code = fixture __FILE__, "eval_return_with_lambda.rb"
ruby_exe(code).chomp.should == "a,b,c,eval,f"
end
it "raises a LocalJumpError if there is no lambda-style closure in the chain" do
code = fixture __FILE__, "eval_return_without_lambda.rb"
ruby_exe(code).chomp.should == "a,b,c,e,LocalJumpError,f"
end
describe "with a magic encoding comment" do
it "uses the magic comment encoding for the encoding of literal strings" do
code = "# encoding: UTF-8\n'é'.encoding".b
code.encoding.should == Encoding::BINARY
eval(code).should == Encoding::UTF_8
end
it "uses the magic comment encoding for parsing constants" do
code = <<CODE.b
# encoding: UTF-8
class EvalSpecs
Vπ = 3.14
end
CODE
code.encoding.should == Encoding::BINARY
eval(code)
EvalSpecs.constants(false).should include(:"Vπ")
EvalSpecs::Vπ.should == 3.14
end
it "allows an emacs-style magic comment encoding" do
code = <<CODE.b
# -*- encoding: UTF-8 -*-
class EvalSpecs
Vπemacs = 3.14
end
CODE
code.encoding.should == Encoding::BINARY
eval(code)
EvalSpecs.constants(false).should include(:"Vπemacs")
EvalSpecs::Vπemacs.should == 3.14
end
it "allows spaces before the magic encoding comment" do
code = <<CODE.b
\t \t # encoding: UTF-8
class EvalSpecs
Vπspaces = 3.14
end
CODE
code.encoding.should == Encoding::BINARY
eval(code)
EvalSpecs.constants(false).should include(:"Vπspaces")
EvalSpecs::Vπspaces.should == 3.14
end
it "allows a shebang line before the magic encoding comment" do
code = <<CODE.b
#!/usr/bin/env ruby
# encoding: UTF-8
class EvalSpecs
Vπshebang = 3.14
end
CODE
code.encoding.should == Encoding::BINARY
eval(code)
EvalSpecs.constants(false).should include(:"Vπshebang")
EvalSpecs::Vπshebang.should == 3.14
end
it "allows a shebang line and some spaces before the magic encoding comment" do
code = <<CODE.b
#!/usr/bin/env ruby
# encoding: UTF-8
class EvalSpecs
Vπshebang_spaces = 3.14
end
CODE
code.encoding.should == Encoding::BINARY
eval(code)
EvalSpecs.constants(false).should include(:"Vπshebang_spaces")
EvalSpecs::Vπshebang_spaces.should == 3.14
end
it "allows a magic encoding comment and a subsequent frozen_string_literal magic comment" do
# Make sure frozen_string_literal is not default true
eval("'foo'".b).frozen?.should be_false
code = <<CODE.b
# encoding: UTF-8
# frozen_string_literal: true
class EvalSpecs
Vπstring = "frozen"
end
CODE
code.encoding.should == Encoding::BINARY
eval(code)
EvalSpecs.constants(false).should include(:"Vπstring")
EvalSpecs::Vπstring.should == "frozen"
EvalSpecs::Vπstring.encoding.should == Encoding::UTF_8
EvalSpecs::Vπstring.frozen?.should be_true
end
it "allows a magic encoding comment and a frozen_string_literal magic comment on the same line in emacs style" do
code = <<CODE.b
# -*- encoding: UTF-8; frozen_string_literal: true -*-
class EvalSpecs
Vπsame_line = "frozen"
end
CODE
code.encoding.should == Encoding::BINARY
eval(code)
EvalSpecs.constants(false).should include(:"Vπsame_line")
EvalSpecs::Vπsame_line.should == "frozen"
EvalSpecs::Vπsame_line.encoding.should == Encoding::UTF_8
EvalSpecs::Vπsame_line.frozen?.should be_true
end
it "ignores the magic encoding comment if it is after a frozen_string_literal magic comment" do
code = <<CODE.b
# frozen_string_literal: true
# encoding: UTF-8
class EvalSpecs
Vπfrozen_first = "frozen"
end
CODE
code.encoding.should == Encoding::BINARY
eval(code)
EvalSpecs.constants(false).should_not include(:"Vπfrozen_first")
binary_constant = "Vπfrozen_first".b.to_sym
EvalSpecs.constants(false).should include(binary_constant)
value = EvalSpecs.const_get(binary_constant)
value.should == "frozen"
value.encoding.should == Encoding::BINARY
value.frozen?.should be_true
end
end
end
|