summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/debian/patches-rt/rtmutex-annotate-sleeping-lock-context.patch
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'debian/patches-rt/rtmutex-annotate-sleeping-lock-context.patch')
-rw-r--r--debian/patches-rt/rtmutex-annotate-sleeping-lock-context.patch2
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/debian/patches-rt/rtmutex-annotate-sleeping-lock-context.patch b/debian/patches-rt/rtmutex-annotate-sleeping-lock-context.patch
index 2317bdd81..dff38f084 100644
--- a/debian/patches-rt/rtmutex-annotate-sleeping-lock-context.patch
+++ b/debian/patches-rt/rtmutex-annotate-sleeping-lock-context.patch
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2017 14:25:13 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] rtmutex: annotate sleeping lock context
-Origin: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/5.2/older/patches-5.2.9-rt3.tar.xz
+Origin: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/5.2/older/patches-5.2.10-rt5.tar.xz
The RCU code complains on schedule() within a rcu_readlock() section.
The valid scenario on -RT is if a sleeping is held. In order to suppress