1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
|
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 12:32:34 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] fs/dcache: bring back explicit INIT_HLIST_BL_HEAD init
Origin: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/4.19/older/patches-4.19.13-rt10.tar.xz
Commit 3d375d78593c ("mm: update callers to use HASH_ZERO flag") removed
INIT_HLIST_BL_HEAD and uses the ZERO flag instead for the init. However
on RT we have also a spinlock which needs an init call so we can't use
that.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
---
fs/dcache.c | 11 +++++++++++
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
--- a/fs/dcache.c
+++ b/fs/dcache.c
@@ -3062,6 +3062,8 @@ static int __init set_dhash_entries(char
static void __init dcache_init_early(void)
{
+ unsigned int loop;
+
/* If hashes are distributed across NUMA nodes, defer
* hash allocation until vmalloc space is available.
*/
@@ -3078,11 +3080,16 @@ static void __init dcache_init_early(voi
NULL,
0,
0);
+
+ for (loop = 0; loop < (1U << d_hash_shift); loop++)
+ INIT_HLIST_BL_HEAD(dentry_hashtable + loop);
+
d_hash_shift = 32 - d_hash_shift;
}
static void __init dcache_init(void)
{
+ unsigned int loop;
/*
* A constructor could be added for stable state like the lists,
* but it is probably not worth it because of the cache nature
@@ -3106,6 +3113,10 @@ static void __init dcache_init(void)
NULL,
0,
0);
+
+ for (loop = 0; loop < (1U << d_hash_shift); loop++)
+ INIT_HLIST_BL_HEAD(dentry_hashtable + loop);
+
d_hash_shift = 32 - d_hash_shift;
}
|
