1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
|
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2019 12:30:12 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] i2c: exynos5: Remove IRQF_ONESHOT
Origin: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/5.2/older/patches-5.2.9-rt3.tar.xz
The drivers sets IRQF_ONESHOT and passes only a primary handler. The IRQ
is masked while the primary is handler is invoked independently of
IRQF_ONESHOT.
With IRQF_ONESHOT the core code will not force-thread the interrupt and
this is probably not intended. I *assume* that the original author copied
the IRQ registration from another driver which passed a primary and
secondary handler and removed the secondary handler but keeping the
ONESHOT flag.
Remove IRQF_ONESHOT.
Reported-by: Benjamin Rouxel <benjamin.rouxel@uva.nl>
Tested-by: Benjamin Rouxel <benjamin.rouxel@uva.nl>
Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
---
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-exynos5.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-exynos5.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-exynos5.c
@@ -791,9 +791,7 @@ static int exynos5_i2c_probe(struct plat
}
ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, i2c->irq, exynos5_i2c_irq,
- IRQF_NO_SUSPEND | IRQF_ONESHOT,
- dev_name(&pdev->dev), i2c);
-
+ IRQF_NO_SUSPEND, dev_name(&pdev->dev), i2c);
if (ret != 0) {
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "cannot request HS-I2C IRQ %d\n", i2c->irq);
goto err_clk;
|
