blob: 28d605fb6e448901f957fb2587786fcd4c978ff4 (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
|
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 17 May 2019 23:22:34 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] locking/lockdep: Don't complain about incorrect name for no
validate class
Origin: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/5.2/older/patches-5.2.17-rt9.tar.xz
[ Upstream commit 978315462d3ea3cf6cfacd34c563ec1eb02a3aa5 ]
It is possible to ignore the validation for a certain lock by using:
lockdep_set_novalidate_class()
on it. Each invocation will assign a new name to the class it created
for created __lockdep_no_validate__. That means that once
lockdep_set_novalidate_class() has been used on two locks then
class->name won't match lock->name for the first lock triggering the
warning.
So ignore changed non-matching ->name pointer for the special
__lockdep_no_validate__ class.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190517212234.32611-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
@@ -732,7 +732,8 @@ look_up_lock_class(const struct lockdep_
* Huh! same key, different name? Did someone trample
* on some memory? We're most confused.
*/
- WARN_ON_ONCE(class->name != lock->name);
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(class->name != lock->name &&
+ lock->key != &__lockdep_no_validate__);
return class;
}
}
|
